PRESS RELEASE
Monday: Nov. 25, 2002
Contact: James Bopp, Jr., General Counsel
Phone 812/232-2434; Fax 812/235-3685
jboppjr@bopplaw.com,
www.jamesmadisoncenter.org
COURT SCHEDULES HEARING ON RESTRAINING ORDER AGAINST
"CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM" REGULATIONS
WASHINGTON Judge Henry Kennedy of the D.C. District Court
will consider whether to issue a temporary restraining order in the case of
Hawaii Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission on Tuesday, November
25, at 4 p.m. James Bopp, Jr., James Madison Center general counsel, will ask
the Court to grant the temporary restraining order on behalf of Hawaii Right to
Life, Inc. ("HRTL").
HRTL recently filed suit challenging several FEC regulations, including one
implementing the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 ("BCRA"). Specifically,
HRTL claims that the FEC regulation defining "electioneering
communication"violates its First Amendment right to free speech by prohibiting
HRTL from engaging in protected issue advocacy during the upcoming special
elections in Hawaii. In addition, HRTL claims that FEC regulations defining
"express advocacy" and "qualified nonprofit corporation" also unconstitutionally
prohibit HRTL from
engaging in issue advocacy under the Supreme Court's decision in FEC v.
Massachusetts Citizens for Life, Inc., 479 U.S. 238 (1986).
As a result of Patsy Mink's (D-Hawaii) untimely death shortly before the
November 5, 2002 general election, Hawaii will hold two special elections. The
first, set for Nov. 30, is to fill the remaining month of her current term. The
second, set for Jan. 4, will fill the new term which begins in January 2003, to
which Representative Mink was
elected posthumously.
The U.S. Supreme Court has held, beginning in 1976, that express advocacy
is limited to "communications that in express terms advocate the election or
defeat of a clearly identified candidate," using terms "such as 'vote for,'
'elect,' 'support,' 'cast your ballot for,' 'Smith for Congress,' 'vote
against,' 'defeat,' (or) 'reject.'" The high court has held that government
may never regulate issue advocacy.
"The challenged regulations are unconstitutional under Supreme Court
precedent," said Bopp. "Unless the Court grants the temporary restraining
order, HRTL will not be able to move forward with its plans run radio ads
giving information about issues and where candidates stand on these issues prior
to these elections." While mentioning
federal candidates, the ads will not contain express words of advocacy. A
temporary restraining order will allow Hawaii Right to Life to engage in its
political speech without fear of enforcement of the law.
To unsubscribe from the James Madison Center for Free Speech e-mail list, please
send ane-mail message with "UNSUBSCRIBE" as the subject to:
dcundiff@bopplaw.com.