PRESS RELEASE    
Contact: Barbara Lyons
Wisconsin Right to Life
August 20, 2004     877-855-5007
blyons@wrtl.org

James Bopp, Jr.
Bopp, Coleson & Bostrom
812-232-2434 (office)
812-243-0825 (cell)
jboppjr@aol.com
 

In Wisconsin Right to Life’s McCain-Feingold Challenge, WRTL Files Emergency Appeal to D.C. Circuit Appeals Court

On August 20, Wisconsin Right to Life (“WRTL”) filed an emergency appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in the case of Wisconsin Right to Life v. FEC. The appeal seeks an immediate injunction to permit WRTL to run grass roots lobbying radio ads and expedited review of the trial court’s refusal to grant such an injunction.

 
The lawsuit seeks an injunction against applying the broadcast blackout periods in the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law to grass roots lobbying ads currently being run by Wisconsin Right to Life. The ads urge Senators Feingold and Kohl to oppose the filibusters of judicial nominees. Because Sen. Feingold is a candidate in the upcoming Wisconsin primary and general election, the broadcast ads cannot be run mentioning his name from August 15 through November 2.
 
James Bopp, Jr., lead counsel for WRTL, observes that “Wisconsin Right to Life has been gagged for almost a week already, while the number of judicial nominees being filibustered has hit double digits and more filibusters are expected shortly.” He adds: “The right to petition a representative is guaranteed in the First Amendment and inherent in our system of representative government. Sen. Feingold is supposed to represent the people who are gagged by his own law – the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law -- from lobbying him. What kind of representation is that?!”

Of the trial court’s decision that the Supreme Court in McConnell v. FEC foreclosed all future challenges to the blackout periods as applied to specific facts, Bopp commented: “The federal courts used to consider themselves the guardians of the First Amendment. Now they view the people’s right to lobby their own Senator with suspicion. And according to the trial court, we don’t get the traditional ‘strict scrutiny’ of laws burdening First Amendment rights -- we get no scrutiny!”
 
The appellate motions and many other documents filed in the case are available online at Wisconsin Right to Life’s website, www.BeFair.org , along with current ads being run and other information about the law suit.